marm-memory v2.48.0 - Give your AI Agents a permanent memory in 60 seconds

Contributions welcome! Browse open issues to contribute, or join the MARM Discord to share workflows, get setup help, and connect with other builders.

Table of Contents

• Quick Start
• Why MARM Memory
• Performance & Scaling Benchmarks
• MCP Client Setup
• Runtime CLI Commands
• Complete MCP Tool Suite
• Using MARM: Talk, Don't Call Tools
• Understanding MARM Memory
• Knowledge Graphs: Code & Concepts
• Architecture & Internals
• Troubleshooting
• Contributing
• Project Documentation

Quick Start

1. Install and initialize with your preferred agent profiles:

pip install marm-mcp-server
marm-memory init --g-claude --g-codex --g-gemini

Also available: --g-qwen and --g-kiro. Run without flags to install into your current project folder instead of home

1. Hand off to your AI companion. Tell your agent:

"Use the marm-init skill to set up MARM."

1. Interact: Your agent will handle the entire setup (Python/Docker, HTTP/STDIO, keys, and client configs) interactively right inside your chat.

Manual setup

Prefer to wire it up yourself:

Replace "agent" with your client’s CLI command (for example, claude, gemini, or qwen). For Codex, use codex mcp add marm-memory --url http://localhost:8001/mcp instead.

• ⚡ Fastest HTTP Startup: Run marm-memory fast-start-http to spin up the local runtime, launch the console, and open it in your browser immediately.
• 🖥️ Web Console: Run marm-memory console to view the local UI app instantly (no Node.js required).
• ⚙️ Lifecycle Management: Manage the background daemon using status, logs --follow, restart, and stop.
• 💡 Quick Flags: Use --no-console or --no-browser to restrict startups. Run marm-memory --help for full command lists.

Why MARM Memory

Your AI forgets everything. MARM Memory doesn't.

marm-memory gives your agents a private, shared memory for the context that normally gets lost between chats: decisions, research, fixes, notes, and project history. Switch from Claude Code to Codex or Gemini without losing the context already gathered.

It brings three things together:

• 🧠 Core Memory (7 tools) stores conversations, notes, notebook entries, and summaries so they stay searchable.
• 💻 Code Graph (5 tools) maps your repository so agents can find symbols, follow code paths, and understand the project without rereading it all. Point it at a repo once and it keeps itself current as you work.
• 🧩 Concept Graph (2 tools) connects people, decisions, errors, and ideas from your stored memories, with links back to relevant code when available. It builds itself as you store memories.

All 14 tools work over HTTP and STDIO. Your agents share the same local memory across sessions instead of starting from scratch each time. The bundled Console App provides a browsable view of Memories, the Knowledge Graph, and Indexed Projects, including progress for graph builds and repository indexing. Indexing a repository creates its independent Code Graph, which you can explore from Knowledge Graph → Code Explorer even before storing any memories.

How It Works

See Performance & Scaling Benchmarks for retrieval latency, concurrency, and write-cost numbers, and Architecture & Internals for the mechanisms behind each layer.

Runtime CLI Commands

marm-memory is the local runtime manager installed with the Python package. These are the normal operational commands; use marm-memory <command> --help for flags and command-specific examples.

Daily runtime work

marm-memory fast-start-http                # start HTTP, Console, and open the browser
marm-memory start                          # start or reuse the managed HTTP runtime
marm-memory start --profile swarm          # shared multi-agent preset
marm-memory stop                           # stop the managed runtime safely
marm-memory restart                        # restart the managed runtime
marm-memory status                         # inspect runtime, database, queue, and graph status
marm-memory logs --follow                  # follow bounded runtime logs
marm-memory console                        # start or reuse the bundled local Console

Transports and setup

marm-memory http                           # run HTTP in the foreground
marm-memory stdio                          # run the strict local MCP STDIO transport
marm-memory init                           # install the MARM skill into detected agents (project scan)
marm-memory init --g-claude                # install the skill into the home-folder claude directory
marm-memory doctor                         # diagnose the local install
marm-memory key init                       # create or reuse ~/.marm/.env without displaying the key
marm-memory key path                       # print the managed key-file path
marm-memory key reveal                     # explicitly display the managed key
marm-memory console --import-key           # open an authenticated local Console session
marm-memory upgrade --check                # compare the installed package with PyPI
marm-memory uninstall                      # preview package removal; always preserves ~/.marm

Knowledge, projects, and maintenance

marm-memory knowledge status               # Indexers, models, and how far behind automatic indexing is
marm-memory knowledge build --all          # Rebuild the whole concept graph (new memories index themselves)
marm-memory knowledge auto off             # Stop indexing memories automatically (on, off, status)
marm-memory projects list                  # List all tracked workspaces
marm-memory projects index <path>          # Add a repo to the code graph (kept current after that)
marm-memory projects status                # Inspect target repo graph readiness
marm-memory projects auto off              # Stop re-indexing repos automatically (on, off, status)
marm-memory maintenance status             # Check internal database optimization state
marm-memory maintenance embeddings migrate # Upgrade old 384-dim vectors to 512-dim
marm-memory maintenance chunks rechunk     # Recalibrate long memory text splits

Docker commands are documented separately below because they require explicit data mounts, network exposure, and key-handling choices.

Performance & Scaling Benchmarks

MARM is tuned for fast recall first, even as memory grows and long memories are chunked behind the scenes.

These measurements use the fastembed-backed jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en encoder and a throwaway local SQLite database. Every timed path calls the shipped MARMMemory code, not a benchmark-local reimplementation. Sections 1-4 are timings from a single run of scripts/benchmarking/performance/bench_hotpath.py on local hardware; absolute milliseconds vary by machine, so treat the scaling shape as the signal. Section 5 is a separate accuracy benchmark (run_eval.py) measuring retrieval rather than speed, and its latest row is a controlled before and after, explained there.

1. Retrieval Latency Scaling

End-to-end recall_similar latency (includes query encoding).

Run-to-run variance at small $N$ is larger than the gap between adjacent sizes, which is why N = 250 reads slower than N = 500 here. Treat the trend from N = 1,000 upward as the real signal.

2. Encoder + Concurrency

• Cold model load: 893ms
• Warm encode: median 3.8ms, p95 4.3ms
• Concurrent recall: 10 gathered recalls completed in 151.5ms vs 176.0ms serial (gather/serial = 0.86). Do not read that as parallelism: repeated runs of this same benchmark land anywhere from 0.63 to 0.86, so the ratio is not stable enough to claim a speedup. The path is serialized around shared encoder and SQLite work by design, and any apparent gain is measurement noise.

3. Write-Time Ingestion Cost

• Consolidation off: median 6.5ms, p95 7.6ms
• Consolidation on: median 58.1ms, p95 106.5ms
• Tradeoff: write-time dedupe/clustering adds 9.0x median cost so recall stays fast and the store stays cleaner over time. Consolidation is off by default.

4. Recall Scaling: Full Scan vs Production Hybrid

Why recall stays flat as memory grows: Instead of scanning every vector, production recall uses an FTS keyword pre-filter to narrow the candidate pool, then re-ranks using a blended semantic + BM25 + temporal score. Both benchmark columns represent authentic asynchronous code paths timed with precomputed vectors to isolate retrieval speed from raw encoding overhead. Tests alternate execution to ensure completely unbiased cache conditions.

The full scan grows roughly linearly with $N$ while hybrid recall grows far more slowly, so the advantage still widens with session size. At very small $N$ the pre-filter is not worth its overhead and hybrid is slower.

5. LoCoMo Retrieval Accuracy

All 10 LoCoMo conversations are ingested through marm_log_entry (5,882 memories), then top-5 marm_smart_recall results are scored against 1,977 evidence-annotated questions. No answer-generation model or LLM judge is involved, so this measures whether the right memory is retrieved, not whether an agent answers correctly with it.

The last row is a controlled comparison, same build and data with the log lane as the only variable. That lane previously substring-matched the whole query against log topics and summaries, so a natural-language question never matched and it scored 0.0% on all 1,977 questions. It now tokenizes the query and reaches 53.3% on its own. Ranges rather than single figures because the semantic lane varies about half a point between runs, so a sub-point difference is not a result.

Multi-hop remains the weakest category at 44.9%, and single-hop evidence recall is 36.6% against a 66.2% any-hit rate, so the lane often surfaces some of a question's evidence rather than all of it. Reproduce with run_eval.py.

6. vs Competitors: Architecture

MARM targets a specific niche: local-first memory for MCP-connected coding agents, not general personalization memory or a full agent runtime. Here's how it differs architecturally from established names in AI agent memory:

Disclaimers & Accuracy: Competitor landscapes evolve rapidly. The matrix above reflects core architectural traits as of Q3 2026, based on public documentation and READMEs, not internal testing of each system. If any data point regarding an alternative framework has changed or is misrepresented, please open an issue or submit a Pull Request to update the table. We actively welcome corrections from peer maintainers.

MCP Client Setup for HTTP & STDIO

Manual pip install

pip install marm-mcp-server

Use this quick rule of thumb to choose your setup

• Local HTTP/STDIO = fastest single-machine setup.
• Docker HTTP = shared/always-on server (key required).
• Docker STDIO = private containerized local use (no HTTP key).

Swarm / multi-agent note: The write queue is enabled by default to serialize memory writes through one worker. For shared HTTP deployments, use marm-memory start --profile swarm (200 RPM) or --profile swarm-max (600 RPM). --profile trusted disables rate limiting entirely for private deployments. STDIO is still best for private single-agent/local use. See Swarm & multi-agent presets for the full table.

pip install marm-mcp-server
marm-memory start
# Stuck on client setup? Open a Q&A thread: https://github.com/Lyellr88/marm-memory/discussions
# most agents use this --transport command
"agent" mcp add --transport http marm-memory http://localhost:8001/mcp
codex mcp add marm-memory --url http://localhost:8001/mcp

pip install marm-mcp-server
python -m marm_mcp_server.server_stdio
# most agents use this --transport command
"agent" mcp add --transport stdio marm-memory-stdio marm-mcp-stdio
codex mcp add marm-memory-stdio -- marm-mcp-stdio

# HTTP shared server, normal multi-agent use
marm-memory start --profile swarm

# HTTP shared server, heavier private swarm
marm-memory start --profile swarm-max

# HTTP trusted private lab/server, rate limiting disabled
marm-memory start --profile trusted

# STDIO remains keyless/private and does not use swarm flags
marm-mcp-stdio

marm-memory docker command                 # preview the exact HTTP command
marm-memory docker run                     # create the managed HTTP container
marm-memory docker stdio-command           # print a Docker STDIO client command
marm-memory docker status
marm-memory docker logs --follow
marm-memory docker stop

# Optional: mount repositories read-only for code indexing.
marm-memory docker run --repo /absolute/path/to/repository

# Optional: preview or explicitly write a Compose configuration.
marm-memory docker compose
marm-memory docker compose --yes

# Shared local server with a custom data path and two repositories for indexing.
marm-memory docker command \
  --profile swarm \
  --data-dir /srv/marm-data \
  --repo /srv/projects/api \
  --repo /srv/projects/web

# Execute the reviewed command, pulling the image first.
marm-memory docker run --profile swarm --data-dir /srv/marm-data --pull