Sandbox
@evolsb/claude-legal-skill

Contract review skill for Claude Code and Codex

This skill helps you review contracts with position-aware analysis, risk flags, market benchmarks, and redline suggestions. It works as an Agent Skills package you clone into a supported tool’s skills directory, then use with prompts like `Review this NDA - I'm the receiving party`.

438 stars57 forksUpdated 1mo ago
Who it's for

Builders who review NDAs, SaaS agreements, M&A docs, and other contracts with agent tools.

What it delivers

You can get a first-pass legal review with specific issues, benchmarks, and replacement language instead of a vague checklist.

What it does

Position-aware review

Adjusts what it flags based on whether you are the customer, vendor, buyer, seller, or receiving party.

Document-type checklists

Uses different checks for NDAs, SaaS/MSAs, payment agreements, M&A deals, and broker or finder agreements.

Market standard benchmarks

Compares terms like liability caps, auto-renewal notice, non-competes, and rep survival against standard ranges.

Negotiability ratings

Marks issues as high, medium, or low based on how realistic they are to change.

Red flags quick scan

Catches urgent problems like uncapped indemnity, unilateral amendment rights, perpetual obligations, and offshore jurisdictions.

Redline suggestions

Produces specific replacement language and missing provisions instead of only naming issues.

Internal consistency checks

Looks for broken cross-references, undefined terms, and similar drafting problems.

How to get it

  1. 1Run
    # Claude Code
    git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.claude/skills/contract-review
    
    # OpenAI Codex
    git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.codex/skills/contract-review
    
    # Other Agent Skills-compatible tools — clone to your tool's skills directory
  2. 2Run
    Review this NDA - I'm the receiving party
  3. 3This skill follows the open Agent Skills standard and works with any compatible tool.
    # Claude Code
    git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.claude/skills/contract-review
    
    # OpenAI Codex
    git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.codex/skills/contract-review
    
    # Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, etc.
    # Clone to your tool's skills directory
  4. 4Run
    git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/Developer/claude-legal-skill
    ln -s ~/Developer/claude-legal-skill ~/.claude/skills/contract-review

README

Contract Review — Agent Skill for Legal Analysis

AI-powered contract review with CUAD risk detection, market benchmarks, and lawyer-ready redlines

GitHub stars License: MIT Agent Skills CUAD Version

Works with: Claude Code · OpenAI Codex · Cursor · GitHub Copilot · Gemini CLI · 26+ tools

Quick Install

# Claude Code
git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.claude/skills/contract-review

# OpenAI Codex
git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.codex/skills/contract-review

# Other Agent Skills-compatible tools — clone to your tool's skills directory

Try It

Review this NDA - I'm the receiving party

Example Output

Demo output showing contract review with red flags, risk analysis, and redline suggestions


Why This Exists

I was reviewing real contracts — NDAs, SaaS agreements, M&A docs, merchant agreements — and wanted AI assistance directly in my coding workflow. So I researched what was available:

  • Commercial legal AI (Kira, Ironclad, LegalOn, Harvey, Spellbook) — enterprise-only, custom quotes, no API access for individual developers
  • Open source tools (LexNLP, OpenContracts, LawGlance) — incomplete projects requiring significant integration work, none designed for AI coding assistants
  • Generic contract checklists — one-size-fits-all reviews that don't differentiate between an NDA and an M&A agreement, give the same advice to buyers and sellers, and say "negotiate this" without telling you what to ask for

Nothing worked as a drop-in skill. So I built one grounded in the CUAD dataset (41 legal risk categories from 510 real contracts), tested it against actual agreements, and iterated until the output was useful for real negotiations.

The result: position-aware review with market benchmarks, document-type checklists, and actual redline language — not just a list of issues.


What It Does

Analyzes legal contracts and outputs:

  • Risk assessment with severity ratings (🔴 Critical / 🟡 Important / 🟢 Acceptable)
  • Red flags quick scan — instant danger sign detection
  • Key terms table with section references
  • Market standard benchmarks — how terms compare to industry norms
  • Negotiability ratings — what's realistic to change given power dynamics
  • Specific redlines — actual replacement language, not just "negotiate this"
  • Missing provisions with suggested language to add
  • Internal consistency checks (broken cross-references, undefined terms)

Generate Deliverables with legal-redline-tools

This skill outputs structured JSON redlines. To produce the tracked-changes Word docs and redline PDFs that lawyers actually send, pair with legal-redline-tools:

pip install git+https://github.com/evolsb/legal-redline-tools.git

# After the skill generates redlines.json:
legal-redline apply contract.docx redlined.docx \
    --from-json redlines.json \
    --pdf redline.pdf \
    --memo-pdf internal-memo.pdf

Features

Position-Aware Review

Tell it which party you are (customer, vendor, buyer, seller, receiving party) — the skill adjusts what it flags as risky.

Document Type Checklists

Specialized checklists for each contract type:

  • NDA — confidentiality term, non-solicitation, standstill, destruction certification
  • SaaS/MSA — SLA, data export, suspension rights, price caps
  • Payment/Merchant — reserves, chargebacks, network rules, auto-debit
  • M&A — earnouts, escrow, rep survival, sandbagging
  • Finder/Broker — fee tails, covered buyer definitions, joint representation

Market Standard Benchmarks

Compares terms to industry norms with clear thresholds:

ProvisionStandardYellowRed
Liability cap12 months6-11 mo<6 mo
Auto-renewal notice90+ days60-89<60
Non-compete1-2 years3-4 years5+
Rep survival (M&A)12-18 mo24-30 mo36+ mo

Negotiability Ratings

Tells you what's actually changeable:

  • High — Mutual termination, cure periods, data export
  • Medium — Liability cap increases, price caps
  • Low — Network rules, regulatory requirements

Red Flags Quick Scan

Instant detection of danger signs:

  • Liability cap < 6 months
  • Uncapped indemnification
  • Unilateral amendment rights
  • Perpetual obligations
  • Offshore jurisdiction (BVI, Cayman)

Jurisdiction Awareness

Flags when governing law affects enforceability:

  • Non-competes void in CA/ND/OK/MN
  • Delaware vs NY vs CA implications
  • Offshore jurisdiction cost/enforcement concerns

M&A Support

Special handling for acquisition agreements:

  • Earnout mechanics and measurement
  • Rep & warranty survival periods
  • Working capital adjustments
  • Escrow/holdback provisions
  • Employment comp in deal value calculations

Installation

This skill follows the open Agent Skills standard and works with any compatible tool.

# Claude Code
git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.claude/skills/contract-review

# OpenAI Codex
git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/.codex/skills/contract-review

# Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, etc.
# Clone to your tool's skills directory

Development (Symlink)

git clone https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill ~/Developer/claude-legal-skill
ln -s ~/Developer/claude-legal-skill ~/.claude/skills/contract-review

Usage Examples

Review this NDA for red flags - I'm the receiving party

Analyze the indemnification in this MSA - I'm the vendor

What are the termination provisions? I'm the customer.

Review this acquisition agreement - I'm the seller

Check this merchant agreement - what's my chargeback exposure?

See examples/ for full sample outputs.


Limitations

  • Not legal advice — always have material terms reviewed by qualified counsel
  • US law focus — analysis defaults to US; provisions vary by jurisdiction
  • Context window — very long contracts may need section-by-section review

Accuracy

Based on ContractEval benchmarks, Claude achieves F1 ~0.62 on clause extraction. Best for first-pass review and issue flagging — not a replacement for attorney review on material deals.


Credits

Next Steps

Contact

Questions or feedback? Open an issue or email chris@ctsheehan.com.

License

MIT — see LICENSE


Built by Chris Sheehan.

Files in the repo

Repository payload6 top-level entries
  • examples
  • .gitignore
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • LICENSE
  • README.md
  • skill.md

Discussion (0)

Ask about usage, or say what you built with it

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to say what this is good for.

More skills

Turn any codebase, with its docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs, into a queryable knowledge graph. A /graphify skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI: local deterministic AST parsing, every edge explained, no vector store.

117k
1 add
Vincentwei1021/
anything2explainer

Topic in, narrated explainer video out. A Claude Code / Codex skill that turns any topic into a black-canvas motion-graphics explainer video with TTS voiceover, subtitles and a chapter progress bar. Chinese or English; every frame drawn in code with Remotion.

666

Open-source AI job search: scan job portals, evaluate listings into a structured A-H report with a global 1-5 score, tailor your CV, track applications — runs locally in your AI coding CLI (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Antigravity…)

71k

Agent skill for beautiful, verifiable architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle diagrams—self-contained HTML with motion and crisp export.

57k
ayghri/
i-have-adhd

A skill to stop your coding agent from burying the answer. ADHD-friendly output.

38k